The Guardian reports today on a study that states that being gay is genetic according to a study by the University of East London.
As earth-shattering as that is
(well, to some people), it makes me ponder about racial preference when it comes to sex. A fair amount of gay men that I've met have said that it's not racist to prefer one racial group
(or groups) over others. Given that
the definiton of racism is "a discrimination or prejudice based on race," that seems like a clear contradiction. If you have a racial preference, then you are racist...right?
However, according to the article in The Guardian:
"The evidence, they conclude, is that people are born with their sexuality defined, and it is not the result of their relationships with other people in their early life, as had been previously thought."
If this definition of sexuality that we're hard-wired with incorporates not just what gender we're attracted to, but also what subset we're attracted to, then this would mean we are hard-wired to be discriminatory with our sexual partners. Indeed, "you're not my type" might have a biological argument.
I just don't think that this is possible. Taking my own sexual history into account, I've slept with men from nearly all ethnicities and body types and enjoyed it immensely. I can't classify the good sexual partners versus the bad ones along racial or physiological lines, because there is no commonality there. Likewise, I've been with racial fetishists
("chocolate queens," to be blunt), guys who have slept with a variety of men, and the well-meaning but tactless "I've never slept with
(insert ethncity/body type here) before" types. During this whole entire time, I've never once made a conscious decision to fight against any preference other than male.
So where does racial sexual preference stem from? I have to say it's from society. If you talk to a lot of gay black men, you'll find that amongst those who date exclusively black they state that one of the main reasons is that it is "just easier," that they can avoid the choppy waters of race relations because they share the same ethnic background. The same argument is often heard by gay Jewish men, gay Italian men, gay latino men, etc.
On the other end of the exclusionary spectrum you have men who will date/sleep with anyone except their own group. With the "snow queens"
(men who chase after caucasian men, often used to describe black men who pursue them), I think it's a variation of the stereotypical situation wherein successful black male gets a white spouse or girlfriend to show that he has either: a) "arrived" or b) "just as good." The images that you see in the gay media often support this. If you turn to the average photo page in
HX or
Out, you see musclebound white men cavorting mostly with other musclebound white men with a sprinkling of minorities
(nearly always with musclebound white men) as a nod to diversity. It's not the best image for gay men of colour, but--as much as I don't want be devil's advocate on this--the numbers don't support equal representation for men of colour: we're a minority within a minority, and these magazines want to reach the widest audience possible. However, the side effect of these demographics is that some people percieve white boyfriend/sexual partner = better. This works the other way as well as the words "rice queen"
(desire for Asians) and "bean queen"
(desire for hispanics) attest to.
In both cases, the situation is so exclusionary that no one winds up seeing the other person who they are. The race supercedes the person, a thought which I find disturbing, because people look unique.
Ultimately, I really have to say that I would really like to see a study to pursue this subject. Imagine what the world would be like if we could get to roots of racial preference.